Original Article

JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY AND VIROLOGY. 30 June 2025. 176-186
https://doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2025.55.2.176

ABSTRACT


MAIN

INTRODUCTION

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a member of the Enterobacteriaceae and is found in various habitats, including water, soil, and the intestines and oropharynx of humans and animals (1, 2). There are two main pathotypes of K. pneumoniae, distinct phenotypically, clinically, and genetically: classical K. pneumoniae (C-K. p) and hypervirulent K. pneumoniae (hv-K. p) (3, 4). Phenotypically, hv-K. p shows hypermucoviscous colonies on an agar plate, which can be demonstrated by the string test (>5mm) (5). Clinically, unlike C-K. p, which generally causes hospital-acquired infections in immunocompromised individuals, hv-K. p is implicated in serious community-acquired infections in young and healthy individuals. Initially, hv-K. p was reported in Taiwan in the 1980s in cases of community-acquired liver abscesses; subsequently, infections have been reported in the Middle East (6, 7, 8), India (9), China (10), Europe (11), and America (12). hv-K.p hepatic infections tend to metastasize to other body sites, a clinical feature not previously known in C-K. p or other Enterobacteriaceae(13) Moreover, many reports worldwide have documented extrahepatic infections caused by hv-K. p, including urinary tract infections, pneumonia, kidney abscesses, and septic arthritis (14, 15). At the genomic level, hv-K.p harboring several virulence-associated genes, including crampA, rampA2, iroB, and iucA within a large virulence plasmid termed pLVPK, enables it to be more virulent than the classical pathotypes. This cardinal difference has been employed to differentiate hv-K.p from C-K.p in clinical samples (16, 17). Most previous studies investigated the prevalence of hv-K. p in human clinical samples (4, 18, 19, 20). However, little is known about the prevalence of hv-K. p in non-human sources. It has been hypothesized that non-clinical sources, particularly animals, represent an important reservoir of diverse clones of K. pneumoniae that contribute to inter-species transmission between humans and animals (21). Poultry and the poultry industry, in particular, provide a thriving ground for propagating and spreading pathogens in communities (22). Studies investigating the occurrence, prevalence, and antibiogram profile of hv-Kp in nonclinical sources might provide valuable information that aids in drawing a complete epidemiological figure of that virulent pathotype of K. pneumoniae. Therefore, this study investigated the occurrence and antibiogram profile of hv-K. p in broiler chickens at chicken slaughter shops, representing the final stage in the poultry industry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design, Location, and Sample Collection

This cross-sectional study involved 60 broiler chicken slaughter shops in Thi-Qar province, the fourth-largest province in south Iraq. Broiler chicken slaughter shops, which specialise in slaughtering, de-feathering, and trimming chickens, are widely distributed in Thi-Qar province. We collected 440 broiler chicken cloacal swabs from January to September 2024. The samples were transported via transport medium (Alkaline Peptone Water, HiMedia® laboratories, India) in ice-cooled containers to the microbiology laboratory of Al-Nasiriyah Technical Institute for bacterial isolation and molecular identification.

K. pneumonia Isolation, Identification, and Antibiogram Profiling

The cloacal swabs were directly streaked onto MacConkey agar (HiMedia Laboratories®, India) and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Colonies that showed a mucoid pink colour on the MacConkey agar plate were further purified by sub-culturing on the same culture media. K. pneumoniae was identified using the automated system VITEK II compact (GN ID card, lot No. 2412933103, bioMérieux, France). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of K. pneumoniae was conducted using VITEK II system (GN ID card, AST N419; lot No. 0442845204; bioMérieux, France). The following antibiotics were tested: ceftriaxone, cefepime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, aztreonam, imipenem, meropenem, tetracycline, and azithromycin. Multi-drug resistant isolates were defined as those that showed resistance against three or more antibiotics of different classes, while isolates that showed resistance against imipenem and/or meropenem were classified as carbapenem- resistant isolates (4).

Phenotypic Detection of Hypermucoviscosity (String Test)

To detect the hypermucoviscosity character of K. pneumoniae, the overnight pure colonies of K. pneumoniae on the blood agar plate were stretched using an inoculation wire loop. The formation of a long, viscous thread (>5 mm) is considered a positive string (18).

Molecular Confirmation of K. Pneumoniae and Detection of hv-K.p Pathotype

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by using six primers Table 1. The first primer targeted the ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer (16-23S rDNA ITS) to confirm the identification of K. pneumoniae. The other five primers targeted the hypervirulent-associated genes, namely, iroB, iucA, crmpA, rmpA2, and peg344, as these genes are considered molecular markers that differentiate hypervirulent pathotypes with diagnostic accuracy exceeding 95% (16, 17). The PCR mixture was carried out in 0.2 ml tubes containing 5µl bacterial extracted DNA, 1µl (10 pmol) of each forward and reverse primer, and 5µl of Premix Accuapure (Bioneer, Korea). The remaining volume was completed with deionised water. The thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94°C, 4 min for the 16-23S rDNA ITS; 95°C, 2 min for the hypervirulent genes, denaturation at 94°C, 45 S for16-23S rDNA ITS; 95°C, 30 S for the five hypervirulent genes, annealing at specified temperatures in the Table 1 for 30 S. Extension at 72°C for 5 min (16-23S rDNA ITS), 30 S (iroB), 50 seconds (iucA), 60 seconds (crmpA), and 40 S (rmpA2 and Peg-344). The final extension temperature was set at 72°C for 10 min. The number of reaction cycles was 30 for 16-23S rDNA ITS, and 25 for the five virulence genes. The amplification products were visualised through electrophoresis using agarose gel (2%) stained with Ethidium bromide. Photographs were taken using the gel documentation system (Atta, Japan).

Table 1.

The primer sequences, product sizes, and their annealing temperatures used in this study

Gene Primer sequence
5'-3'
Amplicon size (bp) Annealing
temperature
References
16-23S rDNA ITS F- ATTTGAAGAGGTTGCAAACGAT
R- TTCACTCTGAAGTTTTCTTGTGTTC
130 57°C (23)
iroB F- ATCTCATCATCTACCCTCCGCTC
R- GGTTCGCCGTCGTTTTCAA
235 59°C (17)
iucA F-AATCAATGGCTATTCCCGCTG
R-CGCTTCACTTCTTTCACTGACAGG
239 59°C (17)
crmpA FGTAATAGAGATATAAATATCATATTGA
R- CATCTTTCATCAACCATTTC
588 50°C (17)
rmpA2 F- GTGCAATAAGGATGTTACATTA
R- GGATGCCCTCCTCCTG
430 50°C (17)
Peg-344 F- CTTGAAACTATCCCTCCAGTC
R- CCAGCGAAAGAATAACCCC
508 53°C (17)

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS, version 19). Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The Recovery Rate of K. pneumoniae from Broiler Chicken Intestine

Of 440 cloacal swabs, only 130 (29.5%) were identified as K. pneumoniae based on phenotypic characteristics and molecular detection of the 16-23S rDNA ITS gene, (Fig. 1).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jbv/2025-055-02/N0290550207/images/JBV_2025_v55n2_176_f001.jpg
Fig. 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR products. A, 130 bp 16-23S rDNA ITS; B, 239 bp iucA ; C,588 bp crmpA; D, 235 bp iroB; E, 430 bp rmpA2; F, 508 bp peg-344.

Molecular Detection of Hypervirulent K. pneumoniae

The molecular detection of hypervirulence-associated genes revealed that 35 (26.9%) of 130 K. peumoniae isolates were positive for the hypervirulent genes with varying frequencies and thus identified as hv-K. p, (Fig. 1). The remaining 95 (73.1%) isolates were negative for all hypervirulence-associated genes and thus were designated as C-K. p. Among the hv-K. p, the most frequently detected gene was iucA, found in 31 of the 35 isolates (88.6%), followed by crmpA in 26 (74.3%), iroB in 22 (62.9%), rmpA2 in 16 (45.7%), and peg-344 in 12 (34.3%).

Comparison Between String Test and Molecular Detection of hv-K.p

Of the 130 K. pneumoniae isolates, only 25 (19.2%) were string positive, (Table 2, Fig. 2). Of the 25 string-positive isolates, 20 (80%) were identified to hv-K. p based on the molecular detection of hypervirulent-associated genes. On the other hand, only 15 (14.3%) of hv-K. p did not show hypermucoviscosity (string negative). Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) in diagnosing hv-K. p between the two methods, string test and molecular method. Moreover, compared with the molecular detection of hypervirulence genes as the reference method, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictivity values of the string test were 57.1%, 94.7%, 80%, and 85.7%, respectively.

Table 2.

The association of hypermucoviscosity (string test) and hypervirulent K. pneumoniae pathotype

K. pneumoniae pathotypes Total P-value
hv-K. p C-K. p 0.0001
String test positive 20 (80%) 5 (20%) 25 (19.2)
String test negative 15 (14.3%) 90 (85.7%) 105 (80.8)
Total 35 (26.2) 95 (73.08) 130

Hv-K. penumoniae: positive for one or more hypervirulence-associated genes; C-K. pneumoniae: negative for all hypervirulence-associated genes; P-value = Propability value based on Fishers exact test

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jbv/2025-055-02/N0290550207/images/JBV_2025_v55n2_176_f002.jpg
Fig. 2

Hypermucoid colonies indicated by the viscous thread that are more than 5 mm long, indicative of a positive string test.

Virulence gene profiling and the Hypermucoviscosity Trait of hv-K.p isolates

The hv-K. p isolates in this study were categorised into five groups (I-V) based on the number of detected hypervirulence-associated genes. Group III, characterized by presence of three hypervirulent genes was the most prevalent, accounting for 14 of the 35 isolates (40%). This was followed by group I and II, which harbour five and four hypervirulent genes respectively; each group comprised 17.1% of the Hv-K. p isolates. Group V, with only one gene, included (14.3%), while group IV, positive for two genes, was the least common, comprising (11.4%) of the isolates. Interestingly, there was a clear correlation between the number of hypervirulence-associated genes and the hypermucoviscosity phenotype as determined by string tests. All isolates in group I exhibited the hypermucoviscosity trait, followed by 80.4% of isolates in group II. In contrast, only 25% of group IV isolates showed hypermucoviscosity, and none of group V isolates exhibited this characteristic. The relationship between virulence genes profile (in terms of number and gene combinations) and the hypermucoviscosity phenotype is summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Genotyping of hypervirulent K. pneumoniae isolates in this study based on the number and combination of detected genes and their hypermucoviscosity traits

Virulence gene profiling groups Detected genes No. of isolates (%) Hypermucoviscosity No. (%)
I crmpA, rmpA2, iroB, iucA, peg-344 6 (17.1) 6 (100)
II crmpA, iroB, iucA, peg-344 6 (17.1) 5 (83.4)
crmpA, rmpA2, iroB, iucA
III crmpA, iroB, ucA 14 (40%) 8 (57.1)
rmpA2, iroB, iucA
iroB, iucA, peg-344
crmpA, iucA, peg-344
crmpA, rmpA2, iucA,
IV crmpA, iucA 4 (11.4) 1 (25)
iucA, peg-344
V crmpA 5 (14.3) 0 (0)
iroB
iucA
Total 35 20

Antibiotic Resistance Profile of hv-K. p isolates

The antibiotic resistance profiles of the 35 hv-K. p isolates are presented in Fig. 3. Overall, the isolates exhibited relatively low resistance rates, not exceeding 70%. The highest resistance was observed against gentamicin, with 23 isolates (65.7%) showing resistance, followed by azithromycin, with 18 (51.4%) isolates. The lowest resistance rate was observed for cefepime, with only four (11.4%) demonstrating resistance. Multi-drug resistance was found in 21 of the 35 isolates (60%). Additionally, carbapenem resistance was detected in 16 isolates (45.7%), including two isolates that were resistant to both imipenem and meropenem.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/jbv/2025-055-02/N0290550207/images/JBV_2025_v55n2_176_f003.jpg
Fig. 3

Antibiotic resistance profile of the 35 hv-K. p isolates from the broiler chicken intestine against eight antibiotics.

DISCUSSION

Although four decades have passed since hv-K. p was first recognised in Taiwan, several aspects of its epidemiology remain unexplored (15). One such gap is the potential role of animals as reservoirs contributing to hv-K. p transmission in communities. To our knowledge, this is the first study in Iraq and the Middle East to explore the occurrence of hv-K. pin broiler chickens and highlight chicken slaughter shops as a potential public health risk.

This study revealed a K. pneumoniae prevalence of 29.5% in broiler chickens, consistent with a previous study from northern Iraq (24). This prevalence aligns with similar findings from healthy broiler chickens in Ethiopia, 22% (25), Indonesia, 22.5% (26), and Norway, 25.8% (27). Also, our finding is concordant with the results of a study conducted in Bangladesh, where 34.7% of chicken meat samples were positive (28). However, our prevalence was lower than those reported by Kahin et al. in Ethiopia (29), and Chika et al. in Nigeria (60%) (30). Conversely, our finding exceeded those from Egypt, 15% (31); China, 14.5% (32) and another study in Indonesia, 7.8% (33). This discrepancy may be due to differences in the geographical location, sample types, culturing techniques, and poultry farming practices (25).

The identification of hv-K.p poses a challenge due to limitations of phenotypic methods. However, molecular detection of hypervirulence-associated genes such as crmpA, rmpA2, iroB, iucA, and peg-344, has proven be a highly specific approach with up to 96% accuracy (17). Using this method, we found a 26.9% prevalence of hv-K.p in broiler chickens. Unfortunately, data on hv-K.p. prevalence in chickens are scarce, limiting direct comparison. However, our findings are comparable to a previous study from China (31). Other studies have detected hv-K.p in various animal sources, including oysters, 62.5% (34), pork,16.7% (35), and farm animals, 24.2% (36). Additionally, hypervirulent multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae has been recorded in captive marmosets in Brazil (37), sea lions in California were identified as a potential zoonotic source (38). Our prevalence also parallels findings in human clinical isolates: Iraq, 43.3% (7); Iran, 32.2% (20), and Sudan, 31.6% (39). However, it was notably higher than that reported in European clinical isolates, including Italy, 3.7% (40) and Germany, 7.6% (41).

Among the hypervirulence-associated genes, the most frequently detected gene in our study were iucA, followed by crmpA, iroB, rmpA2, and peg-344. Our findings regarding the icuA gene, which encodes aerobactin, align with previous studies showing it as a dominant siderophore gene in 90% of hv-K.p strains and rarely present in C-Kp (3, 42). Asian studies have similarly reported iucA prevalence ranging from 60-90% (43). The crmpA gene involved in hypermucoviscosity and virulence (3) was detected in 74.3% of our isolates, consistent with other reports (34, 44). Meanwhile, the peg-344 gene, a metabolic transporter protein, was the least frequently detected, consistent with the report from Sanikhani (20). The variation in gene detection frequencies may be due to incomplete virulence plasmid (pVLK) in some isolates (16).

A statistical significance difference (P≤0.05) was observed between the string test (19.2%) and the molecular method (26.9%) for detecting of hv-K.p, with the string test demonstrate low sensitivity 57.1%. This is consistent with the previous studies that reported string test sensitivity ranging from 50% to 90% (17, 45, 46). In our data 14.3% of the isolates that were negative string tests were positive for hypervirulence genes and five isolates of C-Kp tested positive by string test. These finding reinforce the notion that some hv-K.p strains may falsely appear hypermucoviscosity (18, 19, 47). Moreover, as highlighted by Catalán-Nájera et al. (48) that hypermucoviscosity and hypervirulence are distinct and should not be used interchangeably. The expression of hypermucoviscosity can also be influenced by the growth conditions and the type of agar medium used (42, 49).

Regarding the antibiotic resistance, our finding of relatively low resistance rate align with previous studies, indicating that hv-K.p strains generally exhibit low resistance rate compared to those of the classical pathotypes (43, 44). Non-clinical settings: animals often display lower resistance rate than human clinical samples (50). However, remarkable resistance rates were found against gentamicin, azithromycin, and ceftriaxone, with similar findings also being obtained previous reports (31, 51, 52). The widespread use of gentamicin and erythromycin in poultry farms at high doses likely contributes to this trend (53). In our study, 60% of isolates exhibited multi-drug resistance, which is lower than 100% reported by others (33, 53), and the 88.9% observed in animal isolates (50). This low rate may be due to our isolates being predominantly hypervirulent pathotypes as multi-drug resistant phenotype is generally more prevalent among classical strains pathotypes (4). Notably, we detected a high prevalence (45.7%) carbapenem-resistant hv-K.p (CR-hv-K.p). While, this contrast with some studies (54), it along with other that reported CR-hv-K.p ranging from 31.8%- 55.9% (7, 31, 34), and even a higher rate in China (64.1%) (54). The presence of CR-hv-K.p in chickens strongly suggest human to animals transmission, as carbapenem such as imipenem or meropenem are not used in poultry. Although K. pneumoniae is not traditionally considered a zoonotic threat, its ability to acquire and transfer the resistance and virulence plasmids through horizontal and vertical gene transfer, necessitate reconsideration of it zoonotic potential. A key strength of this study is that it is the first to investigate hv-K.p in chicken within this region, a relevant focus given the high consumption of chicken meat due to its affordability compared to other meats. Moreover, unlike previous studies that depended on string test or screened only one or two hypervirulence- associated genes, we evaluated all five proposed hypervirulence associated genes and compare molecular method to the string test in defining hypermucoviscosity. The relatively large sample size further enhances the reliability of our findings. However, this study has limitations, we were unable to obtain clinical isolate from hospitals preventing the assessment the genetic relatedness between chicken and clinical isolates. moreover, since samples were taken from intestinal swabs of slaughtered chickens, data on the clinical status and demographic characteristics, including age, sex, and breed, were not considered in this study.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Not applicable.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

I declared that there is no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

I thank the Al-Nasiriyah Technical Institute Microbiology Laboratory staff for their help in bacteria isolation and morphology identification. This work was self-funded.

References

1

Wareth G, Neubauer H. The Animal-foods-environment interface of Klebsiella pneumoniae in Germany: an observational study on pathogenicity, resistance development and the current situation. Vet Res. 2021:52(1).

10.1186/s13567-020-00875-w33557913PMC7871605
2

Klaper K, Hammerl JA, Rau J, Pfeifer Y, Werner G. Genome-based analysis of klebsiella spp. Isolates from animals and food products in germany, 2013-2017. Pathogens. 2021;10(5)573.

10.3390/pathogens1005057334066734PMC8170897
3

Kocsis B. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: An update on epidemiology, detection and antibiotic resistance. Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung. 2023;70(4):278-287.

10.1556/030.2023.0218638047929
4

Vandhana V, Saralaya KV, Bhat S, Shenoy Mulki S, Bhat AK. Characterization of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (Hv-Kp): Correlation of Virulence with Antimicrobial Susceptibility. Int J Microbiol. 2022;2022. doi: 10.1155/2022/4532707.

10.1155/2022/453270736032181PMC9410983
5

Liu C, Guo J. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hypermucoviscous and aerobactin positive) infection over 6 years in the elderly in China: Antimicrobial resistance patterns, molecular epidemiology and risk factor. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019;18(1):4.

10.1186/s12941-018-0302-930665418PMC6341648
6

Zamani A, Mashouf RY, Namvara AME, Alikhani MY. Detection of magA Gene in Klebsiella spp. Isolated from Clinical Samples. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2013;16(2):173-176.

7

Zuber SA, Ganjo AR. Detection of hypervirulent and classical type of Klebsiella pneumoniae and screening their resistant properties in Erbil city. Zanco J Med Sci. 2024;27(3):329-339.

10.15218/zjms.2023.035
8

Taha MS, Elkolaly RM, Elhendawy M, Elatrozy H, Amer AF, Helal RAEF, et al. Phenotypic and Genotypic Detection of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Hospital-Acquired Infections. Microorganisms. 2024;12(12):2469.

10.3390/microorganisms1212246939770672PMC11728040
9

Shankar C, Veeraraghavan B, Nabarro LEB, Ravi R, Ragupathi NKD, Rupali P. Whole genome analysis of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from community and hospital acquired bloodstream infection. BMC Microbiol. 2018;18(1):6.

10.1186/s12866-017-1148-629433440PMC5809863
10

Zhang S, Zhang X, Wu Q, Zheng X, Dong G, Fang R, et al. Clinical, microbiological, and molecular epidemiological characteristics of Klebsiella pneumoniae-induced pyogenic liver abscess in southeastern China. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8(1):166.

10.1186/s13756-019-0615-231673355PMC6819602
11

Rossi B, Gasperini ML, Leflon-Guibout V, Gioanni A, de Lastours V, Rossi G, et al. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in Cryptogenic Liver Abscesses, Paris, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(2):221-229.

10.3201/eid2402.17095729350134PMC5782876
12

McElheny CL, Iovleva A, Chen N, Woods D, Pradhan A, Sonnabend JL, et al. Prevalence and features of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in respiratory specimens at a US hospital system. Infect Immun. 2025;93(1):e0048624.

10.1128/iai.00486-2439660916PMC11784238
13

Choby JE, Howard-Anderson J, Weiss DS. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae - clinical and molecular perspectives. J Intern Med. 2020;(287(3):283-300.

10.1111/joim.1300731677303PMC7057273
14

Sanikhani R, Moeinirad M, Shahcheraghi F, Lari A, Fereshteh S, Sepehr A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of hypervirulent klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Microbiol. 2021;13(3):257-265.

10.18502/ijm.v13i3.638434540163PMC8416590
15

Russo TA, Marr CM. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2019;32(3): e00001-19.

10.1128/CMR.00001-1931092506PMC6589860
16

Russo TA, Alvarado CL, Davies CJ, Drayer ZJ, Carlino-MacDonald U, Hutson A, et al. Differentiation of hypervirulent and classical Klebsiella pneumoniae with acquired drug resistance. mBio. 2024;15(2):e0286723.

10.1128/mbio.02867-2338231533PMC10865842
17

Russo TA, Olson R, Fang C-T, Stoesser N, Miller M, MacDonald U, et al. Identification of Biomarkers for Differentiation of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae from Classical K. pneumoniae. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(9):e00776-18.

10.1128/JCM.00776-1829925642PMC6113484
18

Elbrolosy AM, Eissa NA, Al-Rajhy NA, El-Mahdy EESA, Mostafa RG. Characterization of virulence genetic profile and resistance patterns of clinical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: Classic versus hypermucoviscous phenotypes. Microbes and Infectious Diseases. 2021;2(3):516-528.

10.21608/mid.2021.74461.1147
19

Liu C, Guo J. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hypermucoviscous and aerobactin positive) infection over 6 years in the elderly in China: Antimicrobial resistance patterns, molecular epidemiology and risk factor. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2019;18(1):4.

10.1186/s12941-018-0302-930665418PMC6341648
20

Sanikhani R, Moeinirad M, Solgi H, Hadadi A, Shahcheraghi F, Badmasti F. The face of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from clinical samples of two Iranian teaching hospitals. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2021;20(1):58.

10.1186/s12941-021-00467-234465335PMC8406009
21

Wall K, Macori G, Koolman L, Li F, Fanning S. Klebsiella, a Hitherto Underappreciated Zoonotic Pathogen of Importance to One Health: A Short Review. Zoonoses. 2023;3(1).

10.15212/ZOONOSES-2023-0016
22

Mourão J, Magalhães M, Ribeiro-Almeida M, Rebelo A, Novais C, Peixe L, et al. Decoding Klebsiella pneumoniae in poultry chain: unveiling genetic landscape, antibiotic resistance, and biocide tolerance in non-clinical reservoirs. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1365011.

10.3389/fmicb.2024.136501138746750PMC11092894
23

Farajzadeh Sheikh A, Abdi M, Farshadzadeh Z. Molecular detection of Class 1, 2, and 3 integrons in hypervirulent and classic Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: A cross-sectional study. Health Sci Rep. 2024;7(5):e1962.

10.1002/hsr2.196238698788PMC11063457
24

Alchalaby AY, Al-Abedi SF, Al-Aalim AM. Isolation and identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae from respiratory disease in chicken. Iraqi Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 2024;38(3):583-588.

10.33899/ijvs.2024.144877.3335
25

Bushen A, Tekalign E, Abayneh M. Drug- and multidrug-resistance pattern of enterobacteriaceae isolated from droppings of healthy chickens on a poultry farm in southwest Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist. 2021;14:2051-2058.

10.2147/IDR.S31218534103951PMC8180262
26

Safika S, Nilasari Z, Pasaribu FH. Detection of antibiotic resistance coding gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria isolated from broiler chickens in West Java, Indonesia. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2022;12(7):190-198.

10.7324/JAPS.2022.120719
27

Franklin-Alming FV, Kaspersen H, Hetland MAK, Bakksjø RJ, Nesse LL, Leangapichart T, et al. Exploring Klebsiella pneumoniae in Healthy Poultry Reveals High Genetic Diversity, Good Biofilm-Forming Abilities and Higher Prevalence in Turkeys Than Broilers. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:725414.

10.3389/fmicb.2021.72541434557173PMC8453068
28

Tanni FY, Rahman Chowdhury MS, Hossain H, Faysal MA, Rahman MA, Al Emon A, et al. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Klebsiella spp. in poultry meat. Heliyon. 2025;11(1): e41748.

10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e4174839866402PMC11761286
29

Kahin MA, mohamed AH, Mohomed AA, Hassan MA, Gebremeskel HF, Kebede IA. Occurrence, antibiotic resistance profiles and associated risk factors of Klebsiella pneumoniae in poultry farms in selected districts of Somalia Reginal State, Ethiopia. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24(1):137.

10.1186/s12866-024-03298-138658825PMC11040913
30

Chika E, Ifeanyichukwu I, Benigna O, Loveday OO, Stanley E, Collins O, et al. Emerging Multidrug Resistant Metallo-β-Lactamases (MBLs) Positive Klebsiella Species from Cloacal Swabs of Poultry Birds. J Bacteriol Parasitol. 2017;08(01): 1000305.

10.4172/2155-9597.1000305
31

Younis G, Awad A, El-Gamal A, Hosni R. Virulence properties and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of Klebsiella species recovered from clinically diseased broiler chicken. Adv Anim Vet Sci. 2016;4(10):536-542.

10.14737/journal.aavs/2016/4.10.536.542
32

Hou G, Ahmad S, Li Y, Yan D, Yang S, Chen S, et al. Epidemiological, Virulence, and Antibiotic Resistance Analysis of Klebsiella pneumoniae, a Major Source of Threat to Livestock and Poultry in Some Regions of Xinjiang, China. Animals. 2024;14(10): 1433.

10.3390/ani1410143338791650PMC11117231
33

Hayati M, Indrawati A, Mayasari NLPI, Istiyaningsih I, Atikah N. Molecular detection of extended-spectrum β- actamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates of chicken origin from East Java, Indonesia. Vet World. 2019; 2(4):578-583.

10.14202/vetworld.2019.578-58331190714PMC6515830
34

Mohammed R, Nader SM, Hamza DA, Sabry MA. Occurrence of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in oysters in Egypt: a significant public health issue. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024;23(1):53.

10.1186/s12941-024-00711-538886796PMC11184735
35

Li Y, Wang Z, Dong H, Wang M, Qin S, Chen S, et al. Emergence of tet(X4)-positive hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae of food origin in China. LWT. 2023;173:114280.

10.1016/j.lwt.2022.114280
36

Mario E, Hamza D, Abdel-Moein K. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae among diarrheic farm animals: A serious public health concern. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023;102:102077.

10.1016/j.cimid.2023.10207737844369
37

Guerra JM, Fernandes NCCA, Morales dos Santos AL, Barrel J de SP, Petri BSS, Milanelo L, et al. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae as Unexpected Cause of Fatal Outbreak in Captive Marmosets, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(12):3039-3043.

10.3201/eid2612.19156233219810PMC7706955
38

Jang S, Wheeler L, Carey RB, Jensen B, Crandall CM, Schrader KN, et al. Pleuritis and suppurative pneumonia associated with a hypermucoviscosity phenotype of Klebsiella pneumoniae in California sea lions (Zalophus californianus). Vet Microbiol. 2010;141:174-177.

10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.03219709820
39

Mohammed KAM, Elhag SAA, Ahmed STES, Gorish BMT, Mohammed SONM, Abdelmula WIY, et al. Molecular Detection of Virulence genes (rmpA2, iuc & iroB) of Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae in Clinical Isolates from Patients in Khartoum State, Sudan. Asian Journal of Research in Infectious Diseases. 2022;9(4):23-31.

10.9734/ajrid/2022/v9i430275
40

Merla C, Kuka A, Mileto I, Petazzoni G, Gaiarsa S, De Vitis D, et al. One-year surveillance for hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae detected carbapenem-resistant superbugs. Microbiol Spectr. 2024;12(3):e03292-23.

10.1128/spectrum.03292-2338289935PMC10913487
41

Neumann B, Stürhof C, Rath A, Kieninger B, Eger E, Müller JU, et al. Detection and characterization of putative hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in microbiological diagnostics. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):19025.

10.1038/s41598-023-46221-w37923898PMC10624845
42

Zhu J, Wang T, Chen L, Du H. Virulence Factors in Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:642484.

10.3389/fmicb.2021.64248433897652PMC8060575
43

Sanikhani R, Moeinirad M, Shahcheraghi F, Lari A, Fereshteh S, Sepehr A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of hypervirulent klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Microbiol. 2021;13(3):257-265.

10.18502/ijm.v13i3.638434540163PMC8416590
44

Lee CR, Lee JH, Park KS, Jeon JH, Kim YB, Cha CJ, et al. Antimicrobial resistance of hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: Epidemiology, hypervirulence-associated determinants, and resistance mechanisms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:483.

10.3389/fcimb.2017.0048329209595PMC5702448
45

Lin YC, Lu MC, Tang HL, Liu HC, Chen CH, Liu KS, et al. Assessment of hypermucoviscosity as a virulence factor for experimental Klebsiella pneumonia infections: comparative virulence analysis with hypermucoviscosity-negative strain. BMC Microbiol. 2011;11(1):50.

10.1186/1471-2180-11-5021385400PMC3060850
46

lee HC, Chuang YC, Yu WL, Lee NY, Chang CM, Ko NY, et al. Clinical implications of hypermucoviscosity phenotype in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates: association with invasive syndrome in patients with community‐acquired bacteraemia. J Intern Med. 2006;259:606-614.

10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01641.x16704562
47

Hefzy EM, Taha RM, Salam SA El, Abdelmoktader A, Khalil MAF. Hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae: Epidemiology, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance. Novel Research in Microbiology Journal. 2023;7(1):1857-1872.

10.21608/nrmj.2023.287177
48

Catalán-Nájera JC, Garza-Ramos U, Barrios-Camacho H. Hypervirulence and hypermucoviscosity: Two different but complementary Klebsiella spp. phenotypes? Virulence. Taylor and Francis Inc. 2017;8(7):1111-1123.

10.1080/21505594.2017.131741228402698PMC5711391
49

Watanabe N, Masuda A, Watari T, Otsuka Y, Yamagata K, Fujioka M. Evaluation of an optimal agar medium for detecting hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae using string test. Access Microbiol. 2024;6(9):0.000834.

10.1099/acmi.0.000834.v339697364PMC11652848
50

Yang F, Deng B, Liao W, Wang P, Chen P, Wei J. High rate of multiresistant klebsiella pneumoniae from human and animal origin. Infect Drug Resist. 2019;12:2729-2737.

10.2147/IDR.S21915531564923PMC6731983
51

Aly MM, Khalil S, Metwaly A. Isolation and Molecular Iidentification of Klebsiella Microbe Isolated from Chicks. Alex J Vet Sci. 2014;43(1):97-103.

10.5455/ajvs.167205
52

Wu H, Wang M, Liu Y, Wang X, Wang Y, Lu J, et al. Characterization of antimicrobial resistance in Klebsiella species isolated from chicken broilers. Int J Food Microbiol. 2016;232:95-102.

10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.00127289192
53

Liza NA, Hossain H, Rahman Chowdhury MS, Al Naser J, Lasker RM, Rahman A, et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Resistance of Extended-Spectrum β -Lactamase (ESBL)-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in Retail Cattle Meat. Vet Med Int. 2024;2024:3952504.

10.1155/2024/395250439346972PMC11438512
54

Hu F, Guo Y, Yang Y, Zheng Y, Wu S, Jiang X, et al. Resistance reported from China antimicrobial surveillance network (CHINET) in 2018. Eur Journal of Clin Microb & Infect Dis. 2019;38(12):2275-2281.

10.1007/s10096-019-03673-131478103
페이지 상단으로 이동하기